SEC Approves Nasdaq Board Diversity Rule

SEC Approves Nasdaq Board Diversity Rule
The agency in a split decision approves a controversial proposal requiring larger companies listed on the exchange to install at least two director candidates enhancing board diversity — or explain why they have not done so.

Share This Post

Share on facebook
Share on linkedin
Share on twitter
Share on email

The Securities and Exchange Commission late Friday, Aug. 6, in a split decision approved a controversial proposal submitted by Nasdaq Inc. (NDAQ) requiring larger companies listed on the exchange to install at least two director candidates that would enhance board diversity — or explain why they have not done so.

Specifically, the Nasdaq proposal requires that its bigger listed corporations with larger boards have at least one director who is a woman and at least one director who “self-identifies as an underrepresented minority or LGBTQ+” — or explain why they don’t. A new provision in the final rule, which emerged following industry participant comments, allows smaller Nasdaq-traded companies with five or fewer directors to only bring on one such candidate, rather than two, or explain why they haven’t done so.

There are 674 Nasdaq-listed companies, including SPACs, that have five or fewer directors, according to relationship mapping service BoardEx, a sister company to The Deal.

Nasdaq also is providing its companies a one-year complementary access for two users to a board recruitment service that would provide access to a “network of board-ready diverse candidates.”

Many Nasdaq-listed companies will need to have at least one director meeting the requirements within two years, by August 2023, or explain why they don’t. Corporations listed on Nasdaq’s largest exchange, Nasdaq Global Select Market, and its midsize exchange, Nasdaq Global Market, will need to seek to have two such candidates within four years of the SEC’s Friday approval or explain why not, while smaller companies on the Nasdaq Capital Market will be expected to meet the requirement within five years.

In addition, all companies listed on Nasdaq are required to produce and disclose statistics about diversity of their board members.

The SEC approval of the Nasdaq requirements also sends a message to activist investors thinking of nominating candidates that gender and racial diversity can give them leverage in board contests at corporations that haven’t met the new listing requirements.

One of the two SEC Republican commissioners opposed the proposal while the other only gave it partial support. GOP SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce opposed the measure, arguing it “relies on crude categorizations of people into racial, gender, ethnic, and LGBTQ+ status boxes that deprive the people being categorized of their individuality and their professional, educational, experiential and personal complexity.”

The agency’s other GOP commissioner, Elad Roisman, supported the Nasdaq proposal’s efforts to promote diversity, noting that “public company boards of directors should not be private clubs with membership limited to narrow social circles.”

Roisman, however, opposed the provision requiring disclosure of board diversity for listed companies. Roisman said he believes the disclosure proposal has “delisting implications for companies” and should have included a “more thorough discussion” about whether it could be considered “state action.”

At issue is a concern that Nasdaq would delist corporations that fail to disclose publicly in proxy statements or periodic reports their board diversity.

Democratic SEC Commissioners Caroline Crenshaw and Allison Herren Lee backed the proposal, arguing in a statement that it is “a step forward for investors on board diversity.” They added, however, there is “more work to be done,” noting that more diversity and transparency should be implemented for senior management and the workforce more broadly.

California and proxy adviser Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. last year issued their own separate demands for board diversity.

This article originally was posted on The Deal on August 10, 2021 by Ron Orol. View the original article here.

Follow Ronald Orol on Twitter and LinkedIn.

About the author

Ronald Orol
Senior Editor at | + posts

Ronald Orol leads coverage of activist hedge fund managers, a high-profile group of corporate investors who press for blockbuster deals and were the subject of his book “Extreme Value Hedging: How Activist Hedge Fund Managers Are Taking on the World.” Ron produces the Activist Daily and Activist Weekly briefings, which offer exclusives, trend pieces and breaking analysis about insurgent investors and their M&A efforts. Ron also authored “Corporate Governance in the Era of Activism,” a digital handbook for CNBC’s Jim Cramer. He previously worked as a financial regulation and activism reporter at MarketWatch and Dow Jones Newswires.

Subscribe To Our Weekly Newsletter, Executive Insight

Receive a macro view of the global leadership landscape, trends, and implications for you and your business in your inbox every Thursday.

More To Explore

Outerbridge Launches Comtech Contest After Urging Review

The upstart activist is seeking to install a minority slate of three directors on the company’s board and The Deal has learned that potential interested buyers have expressed an interest in parts of the business.

Amplify your network

How do you connect to the more than 3 million people and companies profiled in BoardEx?
Scroll to Top